Home
cd ../playbooks
Product ManagementIntermediate

TAM/SAM/SOM Calculator

Calculate Total Addressable Market, Serviceable Available Market, and Serviceable Obtainable Market with explicit assumptions, citations, and 1-3 year projections — defensible market sizing for investors, execs, and PMF validation.

60-90 minutes
By communitySource
#market-sizing#tam-sam-som#investor-deck#business-case#pmf

Your pitch deck says "$50B market" with no source — and the first investor question torpedoes the meeting. Market size without citations is just a guess wearing a tuxedo. The cure is TAM-SAM-SOM with population counts, real data sources (Census, IBISWorld, Statista), and a SOM that's 1-15% of SAM, not 100%.

Who it's for: PMs preparing investor decks, founders sizing markets pre-seed/Series A, exec teams validating new product lines, BizOps leads building business cases

Example

"Size the market for a SmartInvoice tool for US freelancers" → TAM: 60M freelancers × $300 ARPA = $18B → SAM: 12M with active client billing × $300 = $3.6B → SOM: 5% in Year 3 = $180M, 600K customers — with Census/BLS/Statista citations and competition assumptions

CLAUDE.md Template

New here? 3-minute setup guide → | Already set up? Copy the template below.

# TAM/SAM/SOM Calculator

Calculate Total Addressable Market (TAM), Serviceable Available Market (SAM), and Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) with explicit assumptions, citations, and caveats. Use when sizing a market for an idea, business case, or executive review.

Not a back-of-napkin guess — a structured, citation-backed analysis that withstands scrutiny.

## The Three-Tier Model

- **TAM** — Total demand if you captured 100% of the market
- **SAM** — TAM segment you can realistically target (geography, firmographics, product fit)
- **SOM** — Portion of SAM you can capture in 1-3 years (competition, GTM constraints)

## When to Use

- Pitching to investors or execs (deck needs market size)
- Validating product ideas (is the market big enough?)
- Prioritizing product lines (which has bigger opportunity?)
- Setting growth targets

**Don't use:** internal tools with captive users, before defining the problem, as the only validation.

## Step 0: Gather Context

For your own product: website copy, marketing emails, product descriptions, case studies.
No product yet: pull a competitor's homepage / landing page as analog.

## Adaptive Questions (4)

### Q1: Problem Space

1. B2B SaaS productivity (Zapier-like)
2. Consumer fintech (Mint-like)
3. Healthcare/telehealth (BetterHelp-like)
4. E-commerce enablement (Stripe-like)

### Q2: Geographic Region

1. United States — Census, BLS, IBISWorld
2. EU — Eurostat, GDPR considerations
3. Global — World Bank, IMF
4. Specific country/region

### Q3: Industry/Market Segments

(Adapted to Q1+Q2). Example for B2B SaaS US:
1. SMB services (5.4M businesses, $1.2T)
2. Professional services (1.1M firms, $850B)
3. Healthcare providers (900K, $4T)
4. Tech/software (500K, $1.8T)

### Q4: Potential Customers

(Firmographics or demographics). Example:
1. SMBs 10-50 employees
2. SMBs 50-250 employees
3. Solo entrepreneurs / freelancers
4. Service businesses with online presence

## Optional Helper Script

```bash
python3 scripts/market-sizing.py --population 5400000 --arpu 1000 --sam-share 30% --som-share 10%
```

## Output Structure

```markdown
# TAM/SAM/SOM Analysis

## TAM
- Population: [X]
- Source: [Citation + URL]
- Calculation: [population × ARPA = $X]

## SAM
- Segment of TAM: [narrowed]
- Population: [X]
- Calculation
- Assumptions

## SOM
- Realistically capturable: 1-15% of SAM in 1-3 years
- Year 1/2/3 projections
- Competition + GTM assumptions

## Data Sources
- [Census, IBISWorld, Statista, etc.]

## Validation
1. Does TAM align with industry reports?
2. Is SAM realistically serviceable?
3. Is SOM achievable given competition?
```

## Common Pitfalls

1. **TAM without citations** — "$50B market" with no source. Cite Gartner/IBISWorld/Statista.
2. **SOM equals SAM** — assumes 100% capture. SOM should be 1-20% of SAM.
3. **No population estimates** — only dollar amounts. Always include customer counts.
4. **Static assumptions** — calculated once, never updated. Reassess annually.
5. **Ignoring GTM constraints** — "50% of SAM Year 1" with no sales team. Ground in capacity.

## References

- `skills/positioning-statement` — segment size validation
- `skills/problem-statement` — defines the market
- `skills/recommendation-canvas` — informs business outcome projections
- Steve Blank, *The Four Steps to the Epiphany* (2005)

**Data sources:** US Census, BLS, IBISWorld, Statista, Eurostat, World Bank, IMF, Gartner, Forrester.
README.md

What This Does

Walks through 4 adaptive questions (problem space → geography → industry segment → customer profile) then generates a citation-backed TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with population estimates, market size calculations, and 1-3 year SOM projections. Includes optional Python helper script for deterministic math.

Pairs with positioning-statement, problem-statement, and recommendation-canvas.


Quick Start

mkdir -p ~/Documents/MarketSizing
mv ~/Downloads/CLAUDE.md ~/Documents/MarketSizing/
cd ~/Documents/MarketSizing
claude

Provide product context (your website copy, or a competitor analog) plus geography. Claude asks 4 adaptive questions and produces a citation-backed analysis.


The Three Tiers

Tier Definition Typical Range
TAM If you captured 100% of demand Total industry size
SAM Realistically targetable segment 5-30% of TAM
SOM Capturable in 1-3 years 1-15% of SAM

Tips & Best Practices

  • Cite every number. Census, BLS, IBISWorld, Statista, Gartner — with URLs.
  • Population AND dollars. "$1.2B" without "60K customers" can't drive a sales plan.
  • SOM ≠ SAM. A SOM that equals SAM is a tell that you skipped competition analysis.
  • Ground SOM in GTM capacity. "50% Year 1" with no sales team is fiction.
  • Reassess annually. Markets shift; old TAM/SAM/SOM rots.

Common Pitfalls

  • TAM without citations ("the market is huge")
  • SOM = SAM (assumes 100% capture, zero competition)
  • Only dollars, no customer counts
  • Static numbers from 3 years ago
  • SOM that ignores sales/marketing capacity

$Related Playbooks

Product Management

User Story Mapping Workshop

Facilitated 5-question Jeff Patton story mapping workshop — backbone activities, prioritized tasks, walking-skeleton MVP, and 3 release slices for end-to-end incremental delivery.

90-120 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

User Story Mapping (Component)

Hierarchical story map template — segment → persona → narrative → activities → steps → tasks — left-to-right user journey with vertical priority for MVP planning and gap identification.

60-90 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

User Story Splitting (8 Patterns)

Break epics and oversized stories into independently deliverable slices using the Lawrence & Green 8-pattern framework — workflow, business rules, data, AC complexity, major effort, dependencies, DevOps, TADs.

30-45 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

User Story (Mike Cohn + Gherkin)

Translate user needs into testable, outcome-focused user stories combining Mike Cohn's "As a / I want / so that" with Gherkin Given/When/Then acceptance criteria.

15-30 minutes
Beginner
Product Management

VP/CPO Readiness Advisor

Adaptive coaching for the Director-to-VP and VP-to-CPO transition — Three Ps diagnostic, Empowerment Myth, paradigm shift, alliance building, and 4 branches (preparing, interviewing, newly landed, recalibrating).

20-30 minutes
Advanced
Product Management

Workshop Facilitation Protocol

Canonical multi-turn facilitation pattern for interactive PM workshops and advisors — one question per turn, progress labels, entry modes, and decision-point recommendations.

varies by workshop
Intermediate
Product Management

Acquisition Channel Advisor

Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Decide whether to scale, test, or kill each channel with finance-backed reasoning.

10 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

AI-Shaped Readiness Advisor

Diagnose whether your product work is 'AI-first' (efficiency) or 'AI-shaped' (strategic transformation). Score 5 competencies, identify gaps, and get a priority action plan.

15 minutes
Advanced
Product Management

Altitude & Horizon Framework (PM → Director)

Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude (scope) and horizon (time). Diagnose which of four transition zones is creating friction and apply the Cascading Context Map when direction from above is vague.

10 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

SaaS Business Health Diagnostic

Diagnose SaaS business health across growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency. Identify red flags by urgency and get a prioritized action plan with stage-specific benchmarks.

15 minutes
Advanced
Product Management

Compounding PM Operating System

A persistent PM profile that learns your frameworks, vocabulary, and decision patterns across product cycles — comparing predictions to actuals so each cycle gets sharper than the last.

20 minutes
Advanced
Product Management

Context Engineering Advisor

Diagnose whether you're doing context stuffing (volume without intent) or context engineering (structure for attention). Build memory architecture, define context boundaries, and implement the Research → Plan → Reset → Implement cycle.

15 minutes
Advanced

Browse all Product Management playbooks →