Home
cd ../playbooks
Product ManagementIntermediate

Press Release (Amazon Working Backwards)

Write a customer-perspective press release before building — Amazon's Working Backwards forcing function for clarity. If you can't write a compelling PR, the idea may be weak.

60 minutes
By communitySource
#press-release#working-backwards#amazon#vision#alignment#pr-faq

Amazon's product reviews don't start with code — they start with a press release written before anyone builds anything. If the PR isn't compelling, the idea isn't. "Revolutionary new platform with AI" doesn't pass. "Cuts invoice processing from 8 hours to 10 minutes for SMB owners" does. The exercise is the value.

Who it's for: PMs aligning stakeholders before build, founders pitching new products, product leads testing if a concept resonates, exec teams making go/no-go calls

Example

"Write a Working Backwards press release for our invoice automation product" → Headline: "Acme Launches SmartInvoice to Cut Processing Time by 60%" + Problem: "SMBs spend 8 hours/month on manual entry" + Solution: "Automated extraction and approvals" + Beta data: "Saved 5 hours/month average"

CLAUDE.md Template

New here? 3-minute setup guide → | Already set up? Copy the template below.

# Press Release (Amazon Working Backwards)

Write an Amazon-style press release that defines customer value before building. A planning tool that asks: *"If we shipped this perfectly, how would we explain it to the world?"*

Not a launch-day marketing artifact — a forcing function for clarity and customer-centricity.

## The Working Backwards Framework

Popularized by Amazon. Press release + FAQ written before code. Press release must:
- Be customer-perspective
- Focus on problem solved, not features built
- Be 1-1.5 pages
- Be compelling enough that customers would want the product

## Standard Structure

1. **Headline** — clear, benefit-focused
2. **Dateline** — city, state, date
3. **Introduction** — what's launching, who for, key benefit
4. **Problem paragraph** — customer problem solved
5. **Solution paragraph** — outcomes, not features
6. **Quote from leader** — vision, customer commitment
7. **Supporting details** — additional benefits, data
8. **Boilerplate** — company background
9. **Call to action** — how to learn more
10. **Media contact**

## Why This Works

- **Customer-first thinking** — articulates value from customer's POV
- **Clarity forcing function** — if PR isn't compelling, idea may be weak
- **Alignment tool** — stakeholders react to vision before engineering
- **Decision filter** — features that don't make the PR are deprioritized

**Anti-patterns:** Not feature-centric. Not internal jargon. Not vague fluff. Not actual launch copy.

## When to Use

**Use:** Defining new product/major feature, aligning stakeholders before build, testing if idea is compelling, pitching to execs.
**Don't use:** Trivial features, after building (too late), as actual launch press release (this is planning).

## Application

### Step 1: Gather Context

- Product/feature description
- Target customer (`proto-persona`)
- Problem (`problem-statement`)
- Key benefits
- Competitive context (`positioning-statement`)
- Company mission

### Step 2: Headline

Format: "[Product/Feature] by [Company] Aims to [Main Benefit]"

**Quality:** Benefit-focused, specific, memorable.
- ✅ "Acme Workflows Launches Invoice Automation to Cut Processing Time by 60% for Small Businesses"
- ❌ "Acme Launches New Product with AI Features"

### Step 3: Dateline + Introduction

```
[City], [State], [Country], [Date] —

Today, [Company], a [type], announced [news], a [description]. This [product] is set to [main benefit], addressing [key customer problem].
```

2-3 sentences. Name the problem before the solution.

### Step 4: Problem Paragraph

```
[Product] solves [specific customer problem]. According to [source], [supporting data or quote that validates problem].
```

Specific, not "inefficiency." Validated with data, quotes, research.

### Step 5: Solution (Outcome-Focused)

```
[Product] addresses this by [how — outcomes, not features]. [Quote from leader]: "[Customer-empathy quote]."
```

Outcome-first: "Reduces processing time" not "uses OCR."
Quote should reflect customer empathy, not generic excitement.

### Step 6: Supporting Details

```
In addition to [key benefit], [product] also [additional benefits]. According to [statistic], [supporting data].
```

Numbers where possible. Customer-centric.

### Step 7: Boilerplate

```
[Company], founded in [year], is a [type] known for [products/services]. With a focus on [mission], [Company] has [milestones].
```

### Step 8: CTA + Media Contact

```
For more information about [product], visit [website] or contact [name] at [contact].
```

### Step 9: Test the Press Release

1. Would a customer care?
2. Is the problem clear to a stranger?
3. Are benefits measurable?
4. Is it jargon-free?
5. Does it pass the "so what?" test?

If any "no," revise.

## Common Pitfalls

1. **Feature list instead of benefits** → translate features to outcomes
2. **Vague problem** ("solves inefficiency") → specific: "8 hours/month manual entry"
3. **Jargon-heavy** ("leverages cutting-edge ML") → plain language
4. **Generic exec quote** ("we're excited") → customer-focused
5. **No data or validation** → add metrics, beta results, research

## References

- `problem-statement` — defines the customer problem
- `positioning-statement` — informs differentiation and value
- `proto-persona` — defines target customer
- `jobs-to-be-done` — informs benefits

**External:**
- Amazon's Working Backwards process (Ian McAllister, 2012)
- Colin Bryar & Bill Carr, *Working Backwards* (2021)
README.md

What This Does

Walks through Amazon's Working Backwards press release format — headline, problem, solution, leader quote, supporting details, boilerplate, CTA — with quality checks at each step (specific? benefit-focused? validated? jargon-free?).

Pairs with problem-statement, positioning-statement, proto-persona, and jobs-to-be-done.


Quick Start

mkdir -p ~/Documents/PressRelease
mv ~/Downloads/CLAUDE.md ~/Documents/PressRelease/
cd ~/Documents/PressRelease
claude

Provide product description, target persona, problem statement, key benefits, and competitive context. Claude drafts a full PR and stress-tests against the "so what?" test.


The Format

Section Length Purpose
Headline 1 line Clear, benefit-focused
Dateline + Intro 2-3 sentences What/who/key benefit
Problem 1 paragraph Specific, validated
Solution 1 paragraph + quote Outcome-first, customer empathy
Supporting details 1 paragraph Data, additional benefits
Boilerplate 2-3 sentences Company background
CTA + Media 2 lines How to learn more

Tips & Best Practices

  • Outcomes, not features. "Reduces processing 60%" beats "uses OCR."
  • Specific problems. "8 hours/month manual entry" beats "inefficiency."
  • Validate with data. Beta results, customer quotes, research — not aspirations.
  • Customer-empathy quotes. "Owners shouldn't spend weekends on invoices" beats "we're excited to innovate."
  • Pass the "so what?" test. If a target customer says "so what?", you haven't articulated value.

Common Pitfalls

  • Feature list disguised as benefits ("includes AI, ML, OCR")
  • Vague problem statement ("solves inefficiency")
  • Jargon-heavy language ("leverages ML to optimize enterprise workflows")
  • Generic exec quote ("we're excited to bring innovation")
  • No data or validation backing claims

$Related Playbooks

Product Management

Prioritization Framework Advisor

Pick the right prioritization framework (RICE, ICE, Value/Effort, Kano, Buy-a-Feature) based on product stage, team context, decision needs, and data availability — avoid framework whiplash.

30 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

Problem Framing Canvas (MITRE)

Run MITRE's three-phase canvas — Look Inward (your biases), Look Outward (who's affected and who's left out), Reframe (problem + How Might We) — to solve the right problem before solutions.

60-90 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

Problem Statement (User-Centered)

Write an empathy-driven problem statement (I am / Trying to / But / Because / Which makes me feel) that frames product work around user outcomes — not feature requests or business symptoms.

30 minutes
Beginner
Product Management

Product Sense Interview Answer

Six-part spine (clarify → rationale → goal → segmentation → pain → solution) for PM product-sense interviews — sound thoughtful out loud instead of over-scripted on paper.

20-30 minutes per practice answer
Advanced
Product Management

Product Strategy Session

End-to-end product strategy workflow orchestrating positioning, problem framing, discovery, prioritization, and roadmap across 6 phases over 2-4 weeks — with explicit decision points.

2-4 weeks
Advanced
Product Management

Proto-Persona

Create a lightweight, hypothesis-driven persona in hours from existing research, market signals, and team knowledge — a working customer profile before deeper validation.

60 minutes
Beginner
Product Management

Recommendation Canvas (AI Product)

10-component canvas for evaluating AI product proposals — business + customer outcomes, hypothesis with tiny experiments, PESTEL risks, value justification, SMART metrics, and next steps.

90-120 minutes
Advanced
Product Management

Roadmap Planning

Build an outcome-driven roadmap across 5 phases (gather inputs → define epics → prioritize → sequence → communicate) with hypotheses, RICE scores, and stakeholder alignment.

1-2 weeks
Intermediate
Product Management

SaaS Economics & Efficiency Metrics

PM-focused reference for unit economics (CAC, LTV, payback, contribution margin) + capital efficiency (burn, runway, OpEx) + ratios (Rule of 40, magic number) — with cash-trap pitfalls.

30-60 minutes
Advanced
Product Management

SaaS Revenue & Growth Metrics

PM reference for revenue + retention metrics — MRR/ARR, ARPU/ARPA, ACV, churn (logo + revenue), NRR, expansion, quick ratio — with cohort analysis and 10 most common pitfalls.

30-60 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

Product Metrics Reviewer

Product metrics review with trend analysis, anomaly detection, and scorecard generation

10 minutes
Intermediate
Product Management

Product Spec Writer

Write feature specifications and PRDs from problem statements with user stories and acceptance criteria

10 minutes
Intermediate

Browse all Product Management playbooks →