Press Release (Amazon Working Backwards)
Write a customer-perspective press release before building — Amazon's Working Backwards forcing function for clarity. If you can't write a compelling PR, the idea may be weak.
Amazon's product reviews don't start with code — they start with a press release written before anyone builds anything. If the PR isn't compelling, the idea isn't. "Revolutionary new platform with AI" doesn't pass. "Cuts invoice processing from 8 hours to 10 minutes for SMB owners" does. The exercise is the value.
Who it's for: PMs aligning stakeholders before build, founders pitching new products, product leads testing if a concept resonates, exec teams making go/no-go calls
Example
"Write a Working Backwards press release for our invoice automation product" → Headline: "Acme Launches SmartInvoice to Cut Processing Time by 60%" + Problem: "SMBs spend 8 hours/month on manual entry" + Solution: "Automated extraction and approvals" + Beta data: "Saved 5 hours/month average"
New here? 3-minute setup guide → | Already set up? Copy the template below.
# Press Release (Amazon Working Backwards)
Write an Amazon-style press release that defines customer value before building. A planning tool that asks: *"If we shipped this perfectly, how would we explain it to the world?"*
Not a launch-day marketing artifact — a forcing function for clarity and customer-centricity.
## The Working Backwards Framework
Popularized by Amazon. Press release + FAQ written before code. Press release must:
- Be customer-perspective
- Focus on problem solved, not features built
- Be 1-1.5 pages
- Be compelling enough that customers would want the product
## Standard Structure
1. **Headline** — clear, benefit-focused
2. **Dateline** — city, state, date
3. **Introduction** — what's launching, who for, key benefit
4. **Problem paragraph** — customer problem solved
5. **Solution paragraph** — outcomes, not features
6. **Quote from leader** — vision, customer commitment
7. **Supporting details** — additional benefits, data
8. **Boilerplate** — company background
9. **Call to action** — how to learn more
10. **Media contact**
## Why This Works
- **Customer-first thinking** — articulates value from customer's POV
- **Clarity forcing function** — if PR isn't compelling, idea may be weak
- **Alignment tool** — stakeholders react to vision before engineering
- **Decision filter** — features that don't make the PR are deprioritized
**Anti-patterns:** Not feature-centric. Not internal jargon. Not vague fluff. Not actual launch copy.
## When to Use
**Use:** Defining new product/major feature, aligning stakeholders before build, testing if idea is compelling, pitching to execs.
**Don't use:** Trivial features, after building (too late), as actual launch press release (this is planning).
## Application
### Step 1: Gather Context
- Product/feature description
- Target customer (`proto-persona`)
- Problem (`problem-statement`)
- Key benefits
- Competitive context (`positioning-statement`)
- Company mission
### Step 2: Headline
Format: "[Product/Feature] by [Company] Aims to [Main Benefit]"
**Quality:** Benefit-focused, specific, memorable.
- ✅ "Acme Workflows Launches Invoice Automation to Cut Processing Time by 60% for Small Businesses"
- ❌ "Acme Launches New Product with AI Features"
### Step 3: Dateline + Introduction
```
[City], [State], [Country], [Date] —
Today, [Company], a [type], announced [news], a [description]. This [product] is set to [main benefit], addressing [key customer problem].
```
2-3 sentences. Name the problem before the solution.
### Step 4: Problem Paragraph
```
[Product] solves [specific customer problem]. According to [source], [supporting data or quote that validates problem].
```
Specific, not "inefficiency." Validated with data, quotes, research.
### Step 5: Solution (Outcome-Focused)
```
[Product] addresses this by [how — outcomes, not features]. [Quote from leader]: "[Customer-empathy quote]."
```
Outcome-first: "Reduces processing time" not "uses OCR."
Quote should reflect customer empathy, not generic excitement.
### Step 6: Supporting Details
```
In addition to [key benefit], [product] also [additional benefits]. According to [statistic], [supporting data].
```
Numbers where possible. Customer-centric.
### Step 7: Boilerplate
```
[Company], founded in [year], is a [type] known for [products/services]. With a focus on [mission], [Company] has [milestones].
```
### Step 8: CTA + Media Contact
```
For more information about [product], visit [website] or contact [name] at [contact].
```
### Step 9: Test the Press Release
1. Would a customer care?
2. Is the problem clear to a stranger?
3. Are benefits measurable?
4. Is it jargon-free?
5. Does it pass the "so what?" test?
If any "no," revise.
## Common Pitfalls
1. **Feature list instead of benefits** → translate features to outcomes
2. **Vague problem** ("solves inefficiency") → specific: "8 hours/month manual entry"
3. **Jargon-heavy** ("leverages cutting-edge ML") → plain language
4. **Generic exec quote** ("we're excited") → customer-focused
5. **No data or validation** → add metrics, beta results, research
## References
- `problem-statement` — defines the customer problem
- `positioning-statement` — informs differentiation and value
- `proto-persona` — defines target customer
- `jobs-to-be-done` — informs benefits
**External:**
- Amazon's Working Backwards process (Ian McAllister, 2012)
- Colin Bryar & Bill Carr, *Working Backwards* (2021)
What This Does
Walks through Amazon's Working Backwards press release format — headline, problem, solution, leader quote, supporting details, boilerplate, CTA — with quality checks at each step (specific? benefit-focused? validated? jargon-free?).
Pairs with problem-statement, positioning-statement, proto-persona, and jobs-to-be-done.
Quick Start
mkdir -p ~/Documents/PressRelease
mv ~/Downloads/CLAUDE.md ~/Documents/PressRelease/
cd ~/Documents/PressRelease
claude
Provide product description, target persona, problem statement, key benefits, and competitive context. Claude drafts a full PR and stress-tests against the "so what?" test.
The Format
| Section | Length | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Headline | 1 line | Clear, benefit-focused |
| Dateline + Intro | 2-3 sentences | What/who/key benefit |
| Problem | 1 paragraph | Specific, validated |
| Solution | 1 paragraph + quote | Outcome-first, customer empathy |
| Supporting details | 1 paragraph | Data, additional benefits |
| Boilerplate | 2-3 sentences | Company background |
| CTA + Media | 2 lines | How to learn more |
Tips & Best Practices
- Outcomes, not features. "Reduces processing 60%" beats "uses OCR."
- Specific problems. "8 hours/month manual entry" beats "inefficiency."
- Validate with data. Beta results, customer quotes, research — not aspirations.
- Customer-empathy quotes. "Owners shouldn't spend weekends on invoices" beats "we're excited to innovate."
- Pass the "so what?" test. If a target customer says "so what?", you haven't articulated value.
Common Pitfalls
- Feature list disguised as benefits ("includes AI, ML, OCR")
- Vague problem statement ("solves inefficiency")
- Jargon-heavy language ("leverages ML to optimize enterprise workflows")
- Generic exec quote ("we're excited to bring innovation")
- No data or validation backing claims