Reading Analysis System
Turn passive reading into active learning — capture key arguments, connect books to each other, and identify what to read next to fill gaps.
You've read 30 books this year and can barely summarize 5 of them. Reading without a system for capturing arguments, connecting ideas across books, and identifying gaps is entertainment — not learning. Your bookshelf is impressive but your retention isn't.
Who it's for: voracious readers who want to retain and connect what they learn, book club members who want deeper analysis and discussion preparation, researchers building reading-based knowledge systems, lifelong learners who read across disciplines and want cross-domain connections, educators curating reading lists with intentional learning paths
Example
"Analyze my notes from these 10 books on decision-making" → Cross-book synthesis showing 4 recurring themes, 3 contradicting arguments between authors, connection map linking ideas, reading gaps identified (statistics, behavioral economics), and 5 recommended next reads
New here? 3-minute setup guide → | Already set up? Copy the template below.
# Reading Analysis System
## Role
You help me process and synthesize what I read. You maintain structured book notes, find connections across books, and identify gaps in my understanding that suggest what to read next.
## Directory Structure
- `books/` — Individual book notes using the standard template
- `syntheses/` — Cross-book synthesis by topic
- `reading-list.md` — Prioritized list of what to read next and why
- `book-index.md` — Master index of all book notes by topic
## Book Note Template
For each book in `books/[title-slug].md`:
- **Title & Author**:
- **Date Read**:
- **Core Thesis**: The main argument in 2-3 sentences
- **Key Arguments**: The major points supporting the thesis
- **Notable Quotes**: With page numbers
- **Connections**: How it relates to other books I've read
- **Applications**: How this applies to my life or work
- **Disagreements**: Where I push back on the author
- **Questions Remaining**: What I still want to explore
## Rules
1. Every book note must use the template — no free-form notes
2. Always check existing notes for connections when adding a new book
3. "Applications" is required — reading without application is entertainment
4. Note disagreements — don't just accept everything
5. Questions remaining become reading list candidates
## Commands
- "/book [title]" — Create book note from raw notes/highlights
- "/connect [book]" — Find connections to other books in the library
- "/synthesize [topic]" — Synthesize insights across books on a topic
- "/next [topic]" — Recommend next book to fill gaps in understanding
- "/library" — Show all book notes organized by topicGet new playbooks like this one
One email a week with new Claude Code workflows. Free, like everything here.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What This Does
Transforms reading from passive consumption into active learning. Capture each book's key arguments, connect insights across books, and build a synthesis that reveals what you actually know — and what you should read next to fill the gaps.
Inspired by Marco Kotrotsos's 20 Non-Coding Uses for Claude's Code Mode.
Prerequisites
- Claude Code installed
- Books you've read recently (with notes or highlights)
- Curiosity about connecting ideas across sources
Step-by-Step Setup
- Create your reading folder with
books/andsyntheses/subfolders - Save the CLAUDE.md template
- Add your first book from raw notes or highlights
- After 3+ books, start looking for connections
- Use synthesis to identify gaps and build your reading list
Example Usage
"I just finished Thinking Fast and Slow. Here are my highlights — create a book note"
"How does this connect to Atomic Habits and The Psychology of Money?"
"I've read 5 books on decision-making. Synthesize — where do authors agree and disagree?"
"Based on my reading notes, what should I read next on behavioral psychology?"
"What's my biggest gap in understanding about leadership?"
Tips
- Process books within a week of finishing — fresh impressions are more honest
- The "Applications" field is what makes notes useful months later
- Disagreements with authors sharpen your own thinking
- Synthesis across 3+ books is where real insights emerge