Martech Audit
Audit the martech stack.
Marketing teams lose hours to ad-hoc, inconsistent martech audit work — Audit the martech stack. Use when: evaluating marketing tools, recommending consolidation, or choosing between platforms. This playbook turns the process into a repeatable, brand-aware workflow.
Who it's for: digital marketers, marketing managers, growth marketers
Example
"Run /martech-audit for our brand" → Martech Audit workflow output with brand context, structured inputs captured, process steps executed, and a complete deliverable ready for review.
New here? 3-minute setup guide → | Already set up? Copy the template below.
# Martech Audit
# /dm:martech-audit
## Purpose
Evaluate the current marketing technology stack for gaps, overlaps, integration issues, and optimization opportunities. Produces a comprehensive stack assessment with actionable consolidation and upgrade recommendations tied to ROI projections and implementation feasibility.
## Input Required
The user must provide (or will be prompted for):
- **Current tools/platforms**: List of marketing tools in use, organized by category if possible (e.g., CRM: Salesforce, Email: Mailchimp)
- **Budget for martech**: Current annual martech spend and available budget for changes or additions
- **Team size and technical skill level**: How many people use the stack, their roles, and technical proficiency (beginner, intermediate, advanced)
- **Primary marketing goals**: What the stack needs to support (lead gen, e-commerce, content marketing, ABM, retention, etc.)
- **Pain points with current stack**: Known issues, bottlenecks, manual workarounds, data silos, or team frustrations
- **Growth plans**: Expected team or business growth that may affect stack requirements in the next 12-18 months
- **Compliance requirements**: Any data privacy, security, or regulatory constraints (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, etc.)
- **Integration priorities**: Which tools absolutely must talk to each other (e.g., CRM-to-email, ads-to-analytics)
- **Evaluation scope**: Full stack audit or focused assessment of specific categories (e.g., just analytics, just automation)
## Process
1. **Load brand context**: Read `~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.json` for the active slug, then load `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json`. Apply brand voice, compliance rules for target markets (`skills/context-engine/compliance-rules.md`), and industry context. **Also check for guidelines** at `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/guidelines/_manifest.json` — if present, load restrictions and relevant category files. Check for custom templates at `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/templates/`. Check for agency SOPs at `~/.claude-marketing/sops/`. If no brand exists, ask: "Set up a brand first (/dm:brand-setup)?" — or proceed with defaults.
2. **Map current stack to marketing functions**: Categorize every tool across 11 core functions — CRM, email/marketing automation, analytics/BI, paid advertising, social media management, CMS, attribution/tracking, data/CDP, content creation, SEO, and customer support
3. **Identify gaps**: Flag marketing functions with no tool coverage, assess the business impact of each gap, and recommend solutions at multiple price points
4. **Identify overlaps**: Detect multiple tools serving the same function, quantify redundant license costs, and estimate wasted spend from feature duplication
5. **Assess integration quality**: Evaluate data flow between tools — native integrations, API connections, middleware (Zapier, Make), manual CSV transfers, and isolated data silos that break reporting
6. **Benchmark against industry stack patterns**: Compare the stack composition, tool count, and spend-per-employee against industry norms for the brand's size, vertical, and growth stage
7. **Evaluate cost-per-function efficiency**: Calculate what each marketing function costs to operate factoring tool fees, team time overhead, integration maintenance, and training costs
8. **Score stack maturity**: Rate overall stack maturity on a 5-level scale (manual, basic, integrated, optimized, intelligent) with specific criteria for advancement
9. **Recommend consolidation or additions**: Propose specific tool swaps, upgrades, or additions with rationale — prioritized by impact, implementation effort, and team readiness
10. **Assess future-readiness**: Evaluate whether the current or proposed stack can support the brand's growth plans, emerging channels (AI, conversational, video), and evolving privacy requirements
11. **Create migration/implementation roadmap**: Phase recommendations into immediate wins (0-30 days), short-term changes (1-3 months), and strategic shifts (3-12 months) with risk mitigation and rollback plans for each transition
## Output
A structured martech audit report containing:
- **Stack map**: Visual matrix of current tools mapped to marketing functions showing coverage, gaps, and overlaps
- **Gap analysis**: Uncovered functions with recommended solutions at multiple price points and priority ranking
- **Overlap analysis**: Redundant tools with consolidation recommendations, projected savings, and migration complexity
- **Integration assessment**: Data flow diagram, integration health scores, silo identification, and middleware dependencies
- **Cost analysis**: Per-function cost breakdown comparing current spend to optimized spend with annual savings projection
- **Stack maturity score**: Current maturity level with specific actions needed to reach the next level
- **Recommended changes**: Prioritized list of additions, removals, and replacements with ROI estimates and payback periods
- **Vendor comparison notes**: For recommended new tools, brief comparison of top 2-3 options with pros/cons
- **Implementation roadmap**: Phased migration plan with timelines, dependencies, risk factors, training needs, and rollback plans
- **Future-readiness assessment**: How well the recommended stack supports growth plans, emerging channels, and evolving privacy regulations
- **Quick wins summary**: Top 3 changes that deliver the most impact with the least effort — for executive stakeholder buy-in
## Agents Used
- **marketing-strategist** — Stack strategy alignment with business goals, function prioritization, industry benchmarking, maturity assessment
- **analytics-analyst** — Integration assessment, data flow analysis, measurement infrastructure evaluation, attribution stack review
Get new playbooks like this one
One email a week with new Claude Code workflows. Free, like everything here.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What This Does
Evaluate the current marketing technology stack for gaps, overlaps, integration issues, and optimization opportunities. Produces a comprehensive stack assessment with actionable consolidation and upgrade recommendations tied to ROI projections and implementation feasibility.
Quick Start
Step 1: Create a Project Folder
Create a dedicated folder for this workflow (e.g. ~/marketing/martech-audit).
Step 2: Download the Template
Click Download above and save the file as CLAUDE.md in that folder.
Step 3: Run the Workflow
Open the folder in Claude Code and describe your goal. Claude will prompt you for any missing inputs, follow the structured process, and produce a complete deliverable.
Inputs You'll Need
The user must provide (or will be prompted for):
- Current tools/platforms: List of marketing tools in use, organized by category if possible (e.g., CRM: Salesforce, Email: Mailchimp)
- Budget for martech: Current annual martech spend and available budget for changes or additions
- Team size and technical skill level: How many people use the stack, their roles, and technical proficiency (beginner, intermediate, advanced)
- Primary marketing goals: What the stack needs to support (lead gen, e-commerce, content marketing, ABM, retention, etc.)
- Pain points with current stack: Known issues, bottlenecks, manual workarounds, data silos, or team frustrations
- Growth plans: Expected team or business growth that may affect stack requirements in the next 12-18 months
- Compliance requirements: Any data privacy, security, or regulatory constraints (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, etc.)
- Integration priorities: Which tools absolutely must talk to each other (e.g., CRM-to-email, ads-to-analytics)
- Evaluation scope: Full stack audit or focused assessment of specific categories (e.g., just analytics, just automation)
How It Works
- Load brand context: Read
~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.jsonfor the active slug, then load~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json. Apply brand voice, compliance rules for target markets (skills/context-engine/compliance-rules.md), and industry context. Also check for guidelines at~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/guidelines/_manifest.json— if present, load restrictions and relevant category files. Check for custom templates at~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/templates/. Check for agency SOPs at~/.claude-marketing/sops/. If no brand exists, ask: "Set up a brand first (/dm:brand-setup)?" — or proceed with defaults. - Map current stack to marketing functions: Categorize every tool across 11 core functions — CRM, email/marketing automation, analytics/BI, paid advertising, social media management, CMS, attribution/tracking, data/CDP, content creation, SEO, and customer support
- Identify gaps: Flag marketing functions with no tool coverage, assess the business impact of each gap, and recommend solutions at multiple price points
- Identify overlaps: Detect multiple tools serving the same function, quantify redundant license costs, and estimate wasted spend from feature duplication
- Assess integration quality: Evaluate data flow between tools — native integrations, API connections, middleware (Zapier, Make), manual CSV transfers, and isolated data silos that break reporting
- Benchmark against industry stack patterns: Compare the stack composition, tool count, and spend-per-employee against industry norms for the brand's size, vertical, and growth stage
- Evaluate cost-per-function efficiency: Calculate what each marketing function costs to operate factoring tool fees, team time overhead, integration maintenance, and training costs
- Score stack maturity: Rate overall stack maturity on a 5-level scale (manual, basic, integrated, optimized, intelligent) with specific criteria for advancement
- Recommend consolidation or additions: Propose specific tool swaps, upgrades, or additions with rationale — prioritized by impact, implementation effort, and team readiness
- Assess future-readiness: Evaluate whether the current or proposed stack can support the brand's growth plans, emerging channels (AI, conversational, video), and evolving privacy requirements
- Create migration/implementation roadmap: Phase recommendations into immediate wins (0-30 days), short-term changes (1-3 months), and strategic shifts (3-12 months) with risk mitigation and rollback plans for each transition
What You Get
A structured martech audit report containing:
- Stack map: Visual matrix of current tools mapped to marketing functions showing coverage, gaps, and overlaps
- Gap analysis: Uncovered functions with recommended solutions at multiple price points and priority ranking
- Overlap analysis: Redundant tools with consolidation recommendations, projected savings, and migration complexity
- Integration assessment: Data flow diagram, integration health scores, silo identification, and middleware dependencies
- Cost analysis: Per-function cost breakdown comparing current spend to optimized spend with annual savings projection
- Stack maturity score: Current maturity level with specific actions needed to reach the next level
- Recommended changes: Prioritized list of additions, removals, and replacements with ROI estimates and payback periods
- Vendor comparison notes: For recommended new tools, brief comparison of top 2-3 options with pros/cons
- Implementation roadmap: Phased migration plan with timelines, dependencies, risk factors, training needs, and rollback plans
- Future-readiness assessment: How well the recommended stack supports growth plans, emerging channels, and evolving privacy regulations
- Quick wins summary: Top 3 changes that deliver the most impact with the least effort — for executive stakeholder buy-in