Home
cd ../playbooks
ProductivityIntermediate

Martech Audit

Audit the martech stack.

15 minutes
By communitySource
#martech#audit

Marketing teams lose hours to ad-hoc, inconsistent martech audit work — Audit the martech stack. Use when: evaluating marketing tools, recommending consolidation, or choosing between platforms. This playbook turns the process into a repeatable, brand-aware workflow.

Who it's for: digital marketers, marketing managers, growth marketers

Example

"Run /martech-audit for our brand" → Martech Audit workflow output with brand context, structured inputs captured, process steps executed, and a complete deliverable ready for review.

CLAUDE.md Template

New here? 3-minute setup guide → | Already set up? Copy the template below.

# Martech Audit

# /dm:martech-audit

## Purpose

Evaluate the current marketing technology stack for gaps, overlaps, integration issues, and optimization opportunities. Produces a comprehensive stack assessment with actionable consolidation and upgrade recommendations tied to ROI projections and implementation feasibility.

## Input Required

The user must provide (or will be prompted for):

- **Current tools/platforms**: List of marketing tools in use, organized by category if possible (e.g., CRM: Salesforce, Email: Mailchimp)
- **Budget for martech**: Current annual martech spend and available budget for changes or additions
- **Team size and technical skill level**: How many people use the stack, their roles, and technical proficiency (beginner, intermediate, advanced)
- **Primary marketing goals**: What the stack needs to support (lead gen, e-commerce, content marketing, ABM, retention, etc.)
- **Pain points with current stack**: Known issues, bottlenecks, manual workarounds, data silos, or team frustrations
- **Growth plans**: Expected team or business growth that may affect stack requirements in the next 12-18 months
- **Compliance requirements**: Any data privacy, security, or regulatory constraints (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, etc.)
- **Integration priorities**: Which tools absolutely must talk to each other (e.g., CRM-to-email, ads-to-analytics)
- **Evaluation scope**: Full stack audit or focused assessment of specific categories (e.g., just analytics, just automation)

## Process

1. **Load brand context**: Read `~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.json` for the active slug, then load `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json`. Apply brand voice, compliance rules for target markets (`skills/context-engine/compliance-rules.md`), and industry context. **Also check for guidelines** at `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/guidelines/_manifest.json` — if present, load restrictions and relevant category files. Check for custom templates at `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/templates/`. Check for agency SOPs at `~/.claude-marketing/sops/`. If no brand exists, ask: "Set up a brand first (/dm:brand-setup)?" — or proceed with defaults.
2. **Map current stack to marketing functions**: Categorize every tool across 11 core functions — CRM, email/marketing automation, analytics/BI, paid advertising, social media management, CMS, attribution/tracking, data/CDP, content creation, SEO, and customer support
3. **Identify gaps**: Flag marketing functions with no tool coverage, assess the business impact of each gap, and recommend solutions at multiple price points
4. **Identify overlaps**: Detect multiple tools serving the same function, quantify redundant license costs, and estimate wasted spend from feature duplication
5. **Assess integration quality**: Evaluate data flow between tools — native integrations, API connections, middleware (Zapier, Make), manual CSV transfers, and isolated data silos that break reporting
6. **Benchmark against industry stack patterns**: Compare the stack composition, tool count, and spend-per-employee against industry norms for the brand's size, vertical, and growth stage
7. **Evaluate cost-per-function efficiency**: Calculate what each marketing function costs to operate factoring tool fees, team time overhead, integration maintenance, and training costs
8. **Score stack maturity**: Rate overall stack maturity on a 5-level scale (manual, basic, integrated, optimized, intelligent) with specific criteria for advancement
9. **Recommend consolidation or additions**: Propose specific tool swaps, upgrades, or additions with rationale — prioritized by impact, implementation effort, and team readiness
10. **Assess future-readiness**: Evaluate whether the current or proposed stack can support the brand's growth plans, emerging channels (AI, conversational, video), and evolving privacy requirements
11. **Create migration/implementation roadmap**: Phase recommendations into immediate wins (0-30 days), short-term changes (1-3 months), and strategic shifts (3-12 months) with risk mitigation and rollback plans for each transition

## Output

A structured martech audit report containing:

- **Stack map**: Visual matrix of current tools mapped to marketing functions showing coverage, gaps, and overlaps
- **Gap analysis**: Uncovered functions with recommended solutions at multiple price points and priority ranking
- **Overlap analysis**: Redundant tools with consolidation recommendations, projected savings, and migration complexity
- **Integration assessment**: Data flow diagram, integration health scores, silo identification, and middleware dependencies
- **Cost analysis**: Per-function cost breakdown comparing current spend to optimized spend with annual savings projection
- **Stack maturity score**: Current maturity level with specific actions needed to reach the next level
- **Recommended changes**: Prioritized list of additions, removals, and replacements with ROI estimates and payback periods
- **Vendor comparison notes**: For recommended new tools, brief comparison of top 2-3 options with pros/cons
- **Implementation roadmap**: Phased migration plan with timelines, dependencies, risk factors, training needs, and rollback plans
- **Future-readiness assessment**: How well the recommended stack supports growth plans, emerging channels, and evolving privacy regulations
- **Quick wins summary**: Top 3 changes that deliver the most impact with the least effort — for executive stakeholder buy-in

## Agents Used

- **marketing-strategist** — Stack strategy alignment with business goals, function prioritization, industry benchmarking, maturity assessment
- **analytics-analyst** — Integration assessment, data flow analysis, measurement infrastructure evaluation, attribution stack review
README.md

What This Does

Evaluate the current marketing technology stack for gaps, overlaps, integration issues, and optimization opportunities. Produces a comprehensive stack assessment with actionable consolidation and upgrade recommendations tied to ROI projections and implementation feasibility.


Quick Start

Step 1: Create a Project Folder

Create a dedicated folder for this workflow (e.g. ~/marketing/martech-audit).

Step 2: Download the Template

Click Download above and save the file as CLAUDE.md in that folder.

Step 3: Run the Workflow

Open the folder in Claude Code and describe your goal. Claude will prompt you for any missing inputs, follow the structured process, and produce a complete deliverable.


Inputs You'll Need

The user must provide (or will be prompted for):

  • Current tools/platforms: List of marketing tools in use, organized by category if possible (e.g., CRM: Salesforce, Email: Mailchimp)
  • Budget for martech: Current annual martech spend and available budget for changes or additions
  • Team size and technical skill level: How many people use the stack, their roles, and technical proficiency (beginner, intermediate, advanced)
  • Primary marketing goals: What the stack needs to support (lead gen, e-commerce, content marketing, ABM, retention, etc.)
  • Pain points with current stack: Known issues, bottlenecks, manual workarounds, data silos, or team frustrations
  • Growth plans: Expected team or business growth that may affect stack requirements in the next 12-18 months
  • Compliance requirements: Any data privacy, security, or regulatory constraints (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, etc.)
  • Integration priorities: Which tools absolutely must talk to each other (e.g., CRM-to-email, ads-to-analytics)
  • Evaluation scope: Full stack audit or focused assessment of specific categories (e.g., just analytics, just automation)

How It Works

  1. Load brand context: Read ~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.json for the active slug, then load ~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json. Apply brand voice, compliance rules for target markets (skills/context-engine/compliance-rules.md), and industry context. Also check for guidelines at ~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/guidelines/_manifest.json — if present, load restrictions and relevant category files. Check for custom templates at ~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/templates/. Check for agency SOPs at ~/.claude-marketing/sops/. If no brand exists, ask: "Set up a brand first (/dm:brand-setup)?" — or proceed with defaults.
  2. Map current stack to marketing functions: Categorize every tool across 11 core functions — CRM, email/marketing automation, analytics/BI, paid advertising, social media management, CMS, attribution/tracking, data/CDP, content creation, SEO, and customer support
  3. Identify gaps: Flag marketing functions with no tool coverage, assess the business impact of each gap, and recommend solutions at multiple price points
  4. Identify overlaps: Detect multiple tools serving the same function, quantify redundant license costs, and estimate wasted spend from feature duplication
  5. Assess integration quality: Evaluate data flow between tools — native integrations, API connections, middleware (Zapier, Make), manual CSV transfers, and isolated data silos that break reporting
  6. Benchmark against industry stack patterns: Compare the stack composition, tool count, and spend-per-employee against industry norms for the brand's size, vertical, and growth stage
  7. Evaluate cost-per-function efficiency: Calculate what each marketing function costs to operate factoring tool fees, team time overhead, integration maintenance, and training costs
  8. Score stack maturity: Rate overall stack maturity on a 5-level scale (manual, basic, integrated, optimized, intelligent) with specific criteria for advancement
  9. Recommend consolidation or additions: Propose specific tool swaps, upgrades, or additions with rationale — prioritized by impact, implementation effort, and team readiness
  10. Assess future-readiness: Evaluate whether the current or proposed stack can support the brand's growth plans, emerging channels (AI, conversational, video), and evolving privacy requirements
  11. Create migration/implementation roadmap: Phase recommendations into immediate wins (0-30 days), short-term changes (1-3 months), and strategic shifts (3-12 months) with risk mitigation and rollback plans for each transition

What You Get

A structured martech audit report containing:

  • Stack map: Visual matrix of current tools mapped to marketing functions showing coverage, gaps, and overlaps
  • Gap analysis: Uncovered functions with recommended solutions at multiple price points and priority ranking
  • Overlap analysis: Redundant tools with consolidation recommendations, projected savings, and migration complexity
  • Integration assessment: Data flow diagram, integration health scores, silo identification, and middleware dependencies
  • Cost analysis: Per-function cost breakdown comparing current spend to optimized spend with annual savings projection
  • Stack maturity score: Current maturity level with specific actions needed to reach the next level
  • Recommended changes: Prioritized list of additions, removals, and replacements with ROI estimates and payback periods
  • Vendor comparison notes: For recommended new tools, brief comparison of top 2-3 options with pros/cons
  • Implementation roadmap: Phased migration plan with timelines, dependencies, risk factors, training needs, and rollback plans
  • Future-readiness assessment: How well the recommended stack supports growth plans, emerging channels, and evolving privacy regulations
  • Quick wins summary: Top 3 changes that deliver the most impact with the least effort — for executive stakeholder buy-in

$Related Playbooks